Skip to content

Website lawsuit early warning for US small businesses

See what could get your business sued over its website.

Law firms sue businesses every week over two things on their websites: tracking scripts that run before a visitor agrees, and accessibility failures. See which ones your site has, and the fix for each.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score. We read 5 public pages.

  • Your exposure score
  • Each issue, with the fix
  • Who got sued near you

420 website tracking lawsuits filed in US federal courts in the last 12 months, from court records updated daily.

Updated Sep 14, 2026

Businesses are sued over their websites every week

Federal filings over websites, counted from court records every day. Pick a state for the cases, the firms and the plaintiffs behind the numbers.

27website accessibility lawsuits filed in the last 30 days
9website tracking lawsuits filed in the last 30 days
834accessibility lawsuits in the last 12 months
420tracking lawsuits in the last 12 months

Counts include federal filings from CourtListener and curated state filings with sources. State-court coverage is partial.

All 50 states
  1. What the scan finds, 1 of 3

    Trackers that fire before anyone clicks accept

    Suitcast loads your pages the way a first-time visitor does and checks every request that leaves the browser before the cookie banner is answered against a catalog of 43 tracking scripts, from the Meta Pixel to session-replay tools, the ones named in California Invasion of Privacy Act complaints. You see the script, the page it fired on, and the millisecond it fired.

    Requests before consent

    A dental group's website, name withheld

    Banner: none

    1. Meta Pixel829 ms
    2. Crazy Egg829 ms
    3. Microsoft Clarity945 ms
    4. Hotjar1,832 ms
    5. Microsoft Advertising UET tag829 ms
    6. CallRail725 ms
    7. Google Ads conversion and remarketing tag896 ms
    8. Google Analytics 4828 ms
    9. Google Tag Manager709 ms

    9 trackers fired before consent. There was no banner to reject.

    The pre-consent timeline from a real Suitcast scan of a dental group's website on September 12, 2026, name withheld. The site showed no consent banner, so nothing asked the visitor first.
  2. What the scan finds, 2 of 3

    The accessibility failures named in ADA complaints

    The same automated checks a plaintiff's expert runs first: images without descriptions, unlabeled form fields, empty links and buttons, low contrast, missing page language. Each failure is weighted by how often it appears in website accessibility complaints, and each comes with a fix written for the person who owns the site, naming where the setting lives in Shopify, WordPress or Squarespace.

    1. Links have no text

      5 pages, 10 instances

      Some links on the page have no text, usually because they are an icon or a logo with nothing behind it. A screen reader reads 'link' with no destination, so the visitor cannot tell where it goes. Fix: add text to the link, or add alt text to the image inside it (for example 'Home' on the logo, 'Instagram' on the social icon) in your page editor.

    2. Text is hard to read against its background

      5 pages, 16 instances

      Some text on the page is too light or too close in color to its background. Visitors with low vision or color blindness, and anyone reading on a phone in sunlight, cannot make it out. Fix: darken the text color or lighten the background in your theme's color settings until there is a clear difference; a free contrast checker will tell you when it passes.

    3. Hidden content can still be reached by keyboard

      1 page, 1 instance

      Some content on the page is hidden from screen readers but can still be reached with the Tab key, often a closed menu or pop-up. A screen reader user lands on invisible controls and hears nothing. Fix: ask your developer to make hidden content fully unreachable until it is opened.

    4. Lists contain items that are not list items

      5 pages, 5 instances

      Some lists on the page contain content that is not a proper list item, often from a menu or product grid built by a theme. A screen reader announces the wrong number of items or reads them out of order. Fix: ask your developer or theme provider to correct the list markup.

    The accessibility findings from the same scan, grouped by issue, each with its plain-English fix and the pages it appears on.
  3. What the scan finds, 3 of 3

    Who got sued for the same issues, near you

    Your findings are matched against a daily-updated record of federal website lawsuits: how many businesses in your state were sued in the last 30 days, how many in your industry in 90, which of those complaints name issues your site has right now, and which firms filed them. Every count carries its window and links to the court record.

    Who got sued for the same things

    21

    businesses sued over website accessibility in New York in the last 30 days

    261 in New York in the last 12 months

    5

    companies sued over website tracking in New York in the last 12 months

    9 nationwide in the last 30 days

    77 of those complaints nationwide in the last 90 days name issues this site has right now (links have no text, text is hard to read against its background). 2 were filed against dental practices in the last 90 days.

    • Gottlieb & Associates51 cases, 90 days
    • Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC21 cases, 90 days
    • Usher Law Group P.C5 cases, 90 days
    The who-got-sued box for a dental practice in New York with the findings above. The counts are live from court records, updated daily.

What you get after the first scan

Every Monday, one email that says what moved

A site changes when a plugin updates, a marketer adds a tag, or a theme is swapped. The free scan is a photograph; the weekly re-scan is the thing that catches the tag someone added on a Tuesday and the filing that landed in your state on a Thursday.

  • What changed since last week. New trackers, failures that returned, and problems you marked fixed that came back.
  • Who got sued near you. New filings in your state and industry, and whether their complaints name issues your site still has.
  • One fix to do this week. The highest-weighted finding, with the setting to change, named for the platform your site runs on.
A Suitcast weekly alert email: the exposure score compared with last week, what changed on the site, one fix to do this week, and two new lawsuits filed in the same state.
A weekly alert, rendered from the template Suitcast sends. Site, scores and filings shown are sample data.

Updated daily from court records

The people filing these cases do it in volume

A handful of plaintiff firms and repeat plaintiffs file most website lawsuits, and they file against businesses like yours in batches. Suitcast tracks every firm and every serial plaintiff so you can see who is active in your state this month.

265filings by Equal Access Law Group PLLC in the last 12 months
77repeat plaintiffs with five or more filings in 12 months
8website tracking lawsuits filed per week, 12‑month average

Waiting for a demand letter, or knowing first

Most owners learn about website lawsuits from the letter. Here is what changes when you learn a few months earlier.

  • When you find out
    Waiting for the letter
    When a law firm writes to you, often with a settlement demand attached
    Suitcast
    Within a minute of pasting your URL, then every week
  • What you know
    Waiting for the letter
    That you have been named, and little about why
    Suitcast
    The exact scripts and failures a complaint would cite, page by page
  • What you can change
    Waiting for the letter
    Very little; the filing describes the site as it was
    Suitcast
    Everything: remove or gate the script, fix the pages, keep the record
  • Who else it hit
    Waiting for the letter
    Unknown, unless you pay for research
    Suitcast
    Counts by state, industry and firm, with links to the filings
  • Evidence you hold
    Waiting for the letter
    None
    Suitcast
    Dated scan history showing what was fixed and when
  • Cost
    Waiting for the letter
    Legal fees plus whatever the letter asks
    Suitcast
    One plan, less than an hour of a lawyer's time a month

Pricing

Less than an hour of a lawyer's time a month

Monitor re-scans one site every week and emails what changed and who got sued for it. Pro does the same for five sites with your agency name on the reports. Annual billing is two months free.

50 founding spots left at 50% off while you stay subscribed

Most owners choose this

Monitor

One site, re-scanned every week, with an alert that says what changed and who got sued for it.

$16.25a month

Founding price, half of $32.50. Billed $195 a year, 17% less than monthly.

  • 1 site, up to 100 pages
  • Re-scanned every week
  • Weekly alert with what changed and who got sued for it
  • PDF reports and full scan history
  • Mark issues fixed and see if they come back
Start Monitor at 50% off

14-day money-back guarantee. Checkout and taxes by Polar.

Pro

Five sites for an agency or a multi-location business, with your agency name on every PDF.

$32.92a month

Founding price, half of $65.83. Billed $395 a year, 17% less than monthly.

  • 5 sites, up to 100 pages each
  • Everything in Monitor for every site
  • Agency name on PDF reports
  • One dashboard for all sites
  • Weekly alert per site
Start Pro at 50% off

14-day money-back guarantee. Checkout and taxes by Polar.

Every plan has a 14-day money-back guarantee. Cancel from the billing page at any time; monitoring pauses at the end of the period and your history stays for 90 days. Plan details and billing questions

Questions owners ask first

Short answers. The data pages and the methodology page go deeper.
What is Suitcast?
Suitcast is an early-warning service for US small business websites. It scans a site for tracking scripts that fire before consent and for accessibility failures, then shows how many businesses in the same state and industry were sued over the same issues, by which law firms, updated daily from federal court records.
What is a CIPA website lawsuit?
The California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) is a wiretap law. In the last 12 months alone, plaintiff firms filed hundreds of federal cases arguing that pixels, session-replay and chat tools on a website record visitors without consent. The complaints name specific scripts, such as the Meta Pixel, that loaded before the visitor agreed.
What is an ADA website lawsuit?
A lawsuit under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act claiming a website is not usable by people with disabilities. Complaints usually cite automated findings: images without alt text, unlabeled forms, empty links, missing page language. Over the last year, federal filings concentrated in Illinois, New York, Florida, Wisconsin and Indiana.
What does the free scan check?
Five public pages of your site. It checks every network request made before the consent banner is answered against 43 known trackers, checks whether a banner exists and whether rejecting it stops the scripts, and runs 37 automated WCAG 2.1 A and AA checks that appear in complaints. You get a score, the top three findings, and the lawsuit counts for your state.
What does the scan not check?
Anything behind a login, forms, checkout flows, PDFs, and the manual parts of an accessibility review such as screen-reader navigation order. Automated checks find a portion of what a plaintiff's expert would look at. A clean scan does not mean a site cannot be sued.
Where do the lawsuit counts come from?
Federal filings from CourtListener, the Free Law Project's public archive of court records, refreshed every day, plus state-court filings curated from public sources with a link to the source on every row. Only cases verified as website cases are counted. State-court coverage is partial and every page says so.
Is this legal advice?
No. Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance with the ADA, CIPA, WCAG or any other law or standard. If you have received a letter, talk to a lawyer; the guides on this site explain what the letter usually means.
What happens to my scan data?
Free-scan results are deleted after 30 days if no account is created. Scan pages are private links that are not indexed. Suitcast never contacts or lists the businesses that appear as defendants in its data, and never sells lists.

Check your site before a law firm does

The scan takes about a minute and needs no signup for the score. You see the same things a plaintiff firm looks for, and the fix for each.

Free, about a minute, no signup for your score.

Suitcast identifies risk indicators. It is not legal advice and does not determine compliance.